Subject: Re: Known inconsistencies or bugs in CLHS?
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:20:14 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Sam Steingold <>
| could you please evaluate the following forms in the implementation you
| are using and show us the results?  thanks

  No.  That is a _completely_ bogus approach to resolving this issue.

| Which one is it in your implementation?

  Irrelevant.  I am discussing language issues, not implementation issues.
  I may consider an implementation broken after I understand the language
  issue, and whether I used to use it or not is completely irrelevant and
  the question a gave insult to those who want to help you resolve a
  language issue.  If you were talking public polls about what various
  implementations were doing, you should have said so from the start.


  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.

  Post with compassion: