From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!btnet-peer0!btnet-peer!btnet!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!amsnews01.chello.com!news01.chello.no!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: PART TWO: winning industrial-use of lisp: Re: Norvig's latest paper on Lisp References: <86d6unh1p1.fsf@rowlf.interhack.net> <3233615371462919@naggum.net> <86lm98q600.fsf@gondolin.local.net> <87fzzgjvut.fsf@becket.becket.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3233680042545356@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:27:22 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.no X-Trace: news01.chello.no 1024691242 212.186.234.171 (Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:27:22 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:27:22 MET DST X-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:27:23 MET DST (news01.chello.no) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:35401 * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | I think the problem is that the actual grammatical rules of English | (or any other language) are very complex, and you simply can't find | them in any book. Linguists have been trying to write a correct | and complete syntax for English for a long time, and it's a major | ongoing research project, whose end is nowhere near in sight. ISBN 0-582-51734-6 -- Guide to non-spammers: If you want to send me a business proposal, please be specific and do not put "business proposal" in the Subject header. If it is urgent, do not use the word "urgent". If you need an immediate answer, give me a reason, do not shout "for your immediate attention". Thank you.