From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: The toxicity of trolls Date: 26 Sep 2002 04:34:13 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3242003653519845@naggum.no> References: <3D907716.1070304@web.de> <3241890381047542@naggum.no> <3D9163CE.95C4A177@ilt.fhg.de> <3241945050586549@naggum.no> <3241981977659147@naggum.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1033014854 22838 129.240.65.5 (26 Sep 2002 04:34:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Sep 2002 04:34:14 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:42062 * Brian Palmer | To me, communication between people isn't as black and white as you appear | to be advocating. Are you at all aware of the insult you have just hurled my way? Damn you. | It's not the case where it's either "appeal to everyone's sensitivities" or | "don't appeal to any sensitivities". I asked whether /my/ sensitivities did not count. Could you please answer that question and leave the armchair philosophizing to some later time, like perhaps never? Your selectivity is under question here, not some moronic universality argument that is so easy to argue against that it is incredibly hostile of you to assume such a fantastically idiotic argument on my part. How do you determine whose sensitivity to respect and whose to ignore? -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.