From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: "Well, I want to switch over to replace EMACS LISP with Guile." Date: 16 Oct 2002 22:37:58 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 46 Message-ID: <3243796678973331@naggum.no> References: <44d4f61c.0210140635.c78df51@posting.google.com> <44d4f61c.0210142111.af50c27@posting.google.com> <3243680935954446@naggum.no> <87y98zr8pp.fsf@harris.sdo.us.ray.com> <3243694824668424@naggum.no> <3243708171567859@naggum.no> <87k7kjqn0s.fsf@harris.sdo.us.ray.com> <3243717585684194@naggum.no> <3243780812018665@naggum.no> <87k7kip3y2.fsf@harris.sdo.us.ray.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1034807880 22430 129.240.65.5 (16 Oct 2002 22:38:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Oct 2002 22:38:00 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:44103 * Steven E. Harris | It's depressing to start learning about something new, only to find too | quickly that there's nothing left to learn. Definitely true. Look at it this way: If people hit the ceiling without having to invest enormous amounts of time on idiotic stunts like C++ forces you to, they have an incentive to move to a different language instead of wasting away at the braindamage that I still think C++ is at the level where it could become most interesting. | That is, hitting that "knowledge ceiling" too soon only leads to boredom | and disinterest. But you have acquired skills and an interest in improving your condition that is much more beneficial than staying with a language that exhibits diminishing returns for a constant increase in effort. | C++ keeps my interest where Java could not. Common Lisp appears to offer | a similarly high "ceiling" (perhaps with much earlier reward). Hence my | interest here. This is excellent! I am truly happy to see this and your rationale for it. But it also tells me that Java is a better language than C++ because you /did/ leave for greener pastures instead of staying in C++. If a field gives you a feeling that "I can do better than this" and lets you move on, it gives you freedom. If you get stuck there with a feeling that "with only a little more work, I can improve on this", it is only restricting and confining. Therefore, I would much rather give people Java and tell them to call me when they are exhausted than give them C++ and never hear from them because they vanish into a maze of templates and meta-class programming and whatnot. People who are happy to become the best carpenter in town are a different breed than those who want more and go on to become architects and hire lots of other carpenters and do new and exciting things. I tend to think that it cannot hurt to spend a few years actually building houses if you want to become an architect, and if you get credits for your experience when you want to return to school, that is the most beneficial way to reward real experience. Do you have an alternative model? -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.