From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!news.mailgate.org!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!uninett.no!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: (endp lst) or (null lst) Date: 05 Jan 2003 01:05:03 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3250717503208873@naggum.no> References: <3250662317762335@naggum.no> Reply-To: http://naggum.no/erik/contact.html Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1041728704 11901 129.240.65.207 (5 Jan 2003 01:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jan 2003 01:05:04 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:49869 * Chris Gehlker | Either I'm very confused or the examples are in the wrong order (or | both). Which order did you expect the examples to be in? | It seems more efficient to simply test with consp and avoid | examining the terminal cons. I thought that was exactly what I said. Now I am puzzled. Did you /only/ look at (the order of) the examples? -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.