From ...
From: Erik Naggum <news@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: superior(?) programming languages
Date: 1996/12/21
Message-ID: <3060166789025726@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 205270402
distribution: inet
references: <5536n3$90j@nanaimo.island.net> <58dfqa$95q@A-abe.resnet.ucsb.edu> 	<GJR.96Dec12103926@hplgr2.hpl.hp.com> 	<850477903snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <3059670197357211@naggum.no> 	<850768476snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <3059818967374075@naggum.no> 	<5973ij$55k1@lumen.brightware.com> <3059867157651487@naggum.no> <wkg213d5x7.fsf@laura.ilog.com>
organization: Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313; http://www.naggum.no
newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.lisp


* Harley Davis
| I've looked over the sources of Ilog Talk and I've found exactly the
| following uses of eval:
| 
| * Evaluate forms in the debugger.
| * Evaluate forms in the top-level interactive loop.
| * Evaluate forms when using the built-in test file system.
| * Evaluate forms coming from Emacs.

does that mean that Ilog Talk does not support read-time evaluation as in
the sharp-dot reader macro?

#\Erik
-- 
"He didn't care."
"They never do."