From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper
Date: 1997/04/20
Message-ID: <3070521785789755@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 236119643
References: <rcybba5k9c.fsf@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> <3357A898.7D93@bway.net> <jameslE8uvL5.Kt9@netcom.com> <5ja35t$ntn@roar.cs.utexas.edu> <5jbsjc$dnm@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
mail-copies-to: never
Organization: Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313; http://www.naggum.no
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.scheme.scsh,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.functional,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.eiffel


* Paul Wilson
| You could build a language based on Lisp/Scheme technology with a more
| conventional syntax, and more redundant keywords.

* Fergus Henderson
| Sure, you could, but has anyone done it?

yes.  it's called DYLAN, for DYnamic LANguage.  see comp.lang.dylan.

#\Erik
-- 
I'm no longer young enough to know everything.