From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: `cond', IF .. THEN .. ELSE syntax vx. IF, WHEN, and COND Date: 1998/12/08 Message-ID: <3122086525243963@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 419951100 References: <36685545.E63BE73@IntelliMarket.Com> <749mg8$7fl$1@spitting-spider.aracnet.com> <36687443.2E8142FE@IntelliMarket.Com> <4U1a2.66$9w2.8331@burlma1-snr1.gtei.net> <366AB2CB.8F89BB70@genworks.com> <366B2240.B903BCB@IntelliMarket.Com> <366C6E74.13324472@IntelliMarket.Com> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Kelly Murray | I agree, and believe this reinforces my point: people who don't like | the parens of LISP do so for perhaps personal, irrational or stylistic | reasons -- and therefore telling them they should like it, or educating | them on why they should like it, is just arrogant and ineffective. this is not my experience. telling people that their parenthophobia is misplaced in stupid languages is arrogant and ineffective because they have a reason to fear them. however, people also need to learn, pretty damn quick, that just because some two things look the same doesn't mean they are the same if they occur in two very different contexts. telling people that is perhaps arrogant, but it is effective, because it is true and those who stick to "once-and-for-all" learning aren't useful, anyway. #:Erik -- The Microsoft Dating Program -- where do you want to crash tonight?