From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Dead software (was: A draft business plan for free software LISP vendors) Date: 1999/03/09 Message-ID: <3130012786265490@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 453179928 References: <7att2h$fpm$1@spitting-spider.aracnet.com> <3129456541194192@naggum.no> <7blnuj$ai56v@fido.engr.sgi.com> <3129559935348484@naggum.no> <3129644482406982@naggum.no> <36E39284.E7D332D7@iname.com> <3129896583995790@naggum.no> <36E400F2.24D19A85@iname.com> <3129977246072659@naggum.no> <36E53662.FA3A81F1@iname.com> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Fernando D. Mato Mira" | Why do I bother inserting parenthesized anti-Naggum countermeasures? because you are too stupid to stop thinking in terms of "anti-Naggum". also, because you think you'll get away with idiocy and lunacy if you can be sufficiently vague. that may work with others of your kind, but it doesn't work with me. I don't allow you to misuse a term like "invest" and then treat it as if it wasn't misused. this is called "equivocation" and you may succeed in leading others down the garden path, but don't be such an idiot that you get mad when somebody doesn't accept your tricks. if you have a case, you can make it without equivocation. show us. #:Erik