From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Beating the dead horse again about VB Date: 1999/03/27 Message-ID: <3131534674877050@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 459704841 References: <36F0030D.A59E6173@earthlink.net> <36FBC414.6D506276@earthlink.net> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Marcel K Haesok | I am a relative rookie, but after perusing the language ngs, I came to | the following conlusion: | <<>>; this isn't a statement of a conclusion of an argument. | Tell me where my argument is flawed. easy: there is no argument, just a marketingese catch-phrase. and all we can say about such is that the future is believed to be made out of them, but the present is not. #:Erik