From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Reasons for rejecting Lisp (was Re: Newbie questions [Followup to comp.lang.lisp]) Date: 1999/05/07 Message-ID: <3135074736217837@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 475162717 References: <87g15ee8ss.fsf@foobar.orion.no> <372e265f.2137369@news.select.net> <87d80hdy1t.fsf@foobar.orion.no> <372fb91b.39706364@news.select.net> <87aevldw62.fsf@foobar.orion.no> <7gnhjt$p9q$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <4ogk0a72c.fsf@beta.franz.com> <37326dd3.5537740@news.select.net> <3730c96a.978557761@news.earthlink.net> <3730dd05.8761061@news.select.net> <3732A552.E5A6646E@mindless.com> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Dobes Vandermeer [ a _lot_ of ignorant crap deleted ] in all my years on USENET, I have seen a lot of destructive idiots post their favorite drivel in the guise of facts, and some even manage to look like they have a clue, but I cannot recall anyone quite so destructive or quite so willing to lie and misrepresent as Dobes Vandermeer of the aptly named MINDLESS.COM. _nothing_ he says is true or even relevant to what Lisp can offer today or why this offer is not widely accepted. Lisp does have a problem: it doesn't come with a big enough stick with which to hit the ignorant fucks so they get out of their retarded state. #:Erik