From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: inhibiting GC
Date: 1999/06/02
Message-ID: <3137344303247610@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 484998955
References: <cxj1zfvs64c.fsf@acs5.bu.edu> <3137280845702221@naggum.no> <877lpmoifv.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <3137330375665853@naggum.no>
mail-copies-to: never
Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
| since he was asking about the Allegro CL scavenging garbage collector, I
| thought it would be more instructive to answer in that context, but there
| are of course other GC implementations around.  Emacs', for instance, is
| horribly, horribly in efficient, and Allegro CL's is very fast and also
| very wasteful.

  cursed be editing without proper substructure navigation.  that last
  sentence was intended to read:

  Emacs', for instance, is horribly, horribly inefficient and also very
  wasteful, and Allegro CL's is very fast.

  sigh.

#:Erik
-- 
@1999-07-22T00:37:33Z -- pi billion seconds since the turn of the century