From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: CMUCL and EQUAL hash tables Date: 1999/06/04 Message-ID: <3137523282475496@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 485827820 References: <3137449145193278@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * fredrik@hal.sby.abo.fi (Fredrik Sandstrom) | There never was a substitute for understanding the problem before trying | to respond. ;-) touché | However, I notice that my original sentence above is misleading -- I did | not use an array with a fill-pointer as a hash key, but I used one to do | hash table lookup. The transcript should have made this clear. ok, I tend to ignore examples when whatever they are intended to be examples of is sufficiently well explained. that didn't work this time. looking at your transcript, I agree that GETHASH should work with any old string EQUAL to the key. #:Erik -- @1999-07-22T00:37:33Z -- pi billion seconds since the turn of the century