Subject: Re: cautios question (about languages)
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 1999/08/09
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Christopher Browne
| Are you just a vulgar CLer that read anti-CL sentiment into questions
| whether such sentiment was intended or not?

  well, I recognize _your_ intent.

| When he has asked about several possible paradigms, and how CL might fit
| with them, how, precisely does this represent an implication that CL must
| forcibly be "reduced" to use one paradigm?

  because the questions asked did not indicate that the requestor
  understood that multiple paradigms could be supported by one language.

| I think you're seeing a conspiracy of "Evil Schemers" against CL where
| there isn't one.

  I can beat that: I _know_ you see evil intentions that aren't there.
  I also think you're stupid who can't see more than one way to read my
  anti-Scheme articles and go on to fault me for your own poor vision.

  suppose we blasted all politicians into space.
  would the SETI project find even one of them?