From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism Date: 1999/09/05 Message-ID: <3145524128706489@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 521292757 References: <3144404199547949@naggum.no> <37C17E00.D039AEBD@elwood.com> <_Mfw3.358$m84.6201@burlma1-snr2> <3144558626572658@naggum.no> <3144569678548813@naggum.no> <3144685738025120@naggum.no> <86hflm6whz.fsf@knotwell.ix.netcom.com> <3144735996390160@naggum.no> <87so55z8m1.fsf@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry> <87lnavzbqq.fsf@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry> <3145350277035952@naggum.no> <3145425004322182@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 936535330 2448 193.71.66.49 (5 Sep 1999 12:42:10 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; +1 510 435 8604; http://www.naggum.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Sep 1999 12:42:10 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * William Tanksley | Surely you meant "since there's only one ... package ... there is [only | one] library." no, I meant what I said and said what I meant. if I had meant something else, I would have said that, instead. but now that you don't need what I say to form an opinion about what I have meant, I'll just stop here. you will probably invent the rest of what I had in mind, anyway. #:Erik -- save the children: just say NO to sex with pro-lifers