From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism Date: 1999/09/14 Message-ID: <3146256002925348@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524681450 References: <3144404199547949@naggum.no> <37C17E00.D039AEBD@elwood.com> <_Mfw3.358$m84.6201@burlma1-snr2> <3144558626572658@naggum.no> <3144569678548813@naggum.no> <3144685738025120@naggum.no> <3144868668727852@naggum.no> <3145340726081755@naggum.no> <3145817762263928@naggum.no> <3146108466166290@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 937267204 10829 193.71.66.49 (14 Sep 1999 00:00:04 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; +1 510 435 8604; http://www.naggum.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Sep 1999 00:00:04 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Raffael Cavallaro | ... but are offensive to boot. as I have stated very explicitly, now, whatever you find offensive is your own goddamn problem, not mine. I have discovered that there are a whole bunch of lunatics who get offended if you use any random innocuous word, and although you nutcases are a pain in the ass to live with, I did say I'll try not to use particular words known to cause some sorry people to blow up. get it? if you aren't satisfied with this, go see a shrink. | 3. Stick to lisp in comp.lang.lisp. when you can't take that advice yourself, nobody should listen to you. #:Erik