From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism Date: 1999/09/21 Message-ID: <3146893709341134@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 527757194 References: <3144404199547949@naggum.no> <37C17E00.D039AEBD@elwood.com> <_Mfw3.358$m84.6201@burlma1-snr2> <3144558626572658@naggum.no> <3144569678548813@naggum.no> <3144685738025120@naggum.no> <3144868668727852@naggum.no> <3145340726081755@naggum.no> <3145817762263928@naggum.no> <3146111469145085@naggum.no> <3146287248569582@naggum.no> <3146678502739903@naggum.no> <86n1uishtl.fsf@g.local> mail-copies-to: never X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 937904910 1831 193.71.66.49 (21 Sep 1999 09:08:30 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; +1 510 435 8604; http://www.naggum.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Sep 1999 09:08:30 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Gareth McCaughan | What a pointless argument. Especially since each of you has said | to the other "Stick to Lisp in comp.lang.lisp". Is winning the | argument really so important? he has since made it clear that his real purpose was only to point out how bad he thinks I am. like so many before him, if he couldn't do it with facts, he had to try with a whole bunch of his own inventions. I don't think it's a waste of time to respond to false accusations. neither is it a waste of time to expose cowards and frauds who play games with people's feelings. in consequence, there never was an argument for him to win, it was all for demonstration. I don't consider having shown what a disgusting coward someone is and what that leads to is winning. #:Erik