From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture
Date: 1999/09/27
Message-ID: <3147423680626348@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 529839915
References: <37d6b784.46829757@judy> <sfw1zc6lmw2.fsf@world.std.com> <MPG.124345a2219c65e3989825@news.halcyon.com> <3146036566024257@naggum.no> <7smo4l$ac898@fido.engr.sgi.com>
mail-copies-to: never
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 938434883 17237 195.0.192.66 (27 Sep 1999 12:21:23 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; +1 510 435 8604; http://www.naggum.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Sep 1999 12:21:23 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Erik Naggum
| as I understand this, Scheme cannot generate symbols on the fly in code
| in the first place, since the language is not defined in terms of sexprs...

* Rob Warnock
| [ example of generating symbols, but not on IN CODE elided ]

  so how do you construct an expression that binds a value to a symbol thus
  generated in its lexical scope?
  
#:Erik