From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: LISP and C++ Date: 1999/11/04 Message-ID: <3150708022467208@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 544360349 References: <877lk5v9ac.fsf@2xtreme.net> <87aep0twdb.fsf@2xtreme.net> <7vg08q$9k5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1e0jaez.1e25s7pdh71vkN%cheitzin@ag.or.at> <7vr6td$4kv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> mail-copies-to: never X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 941719225 19449 195.0.192.66 (4 Nov 1999 12:40:25 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879 or +1 510 435 8604; fax: +47 2210 9077; http://www.naggum.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Nov 1999 12:40:25 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * markku.laukkanen@hybrid.fi | How in earth one could get this to work. Hmm... Sounds suspicous. this is what professional Common Lisp programmers leave to their vendors, then we pay them to make sure that it works and that they continue to be in business so we are, too, and then we never ever worry about it, again, but rather think it's the greatest thing, and if we are in the mood and not yet tired of it, snicker at C-based life forms who run around scared. | If the function calls goes by symbol value cell instead the linker label, | the problem is even worse. really? could you elaborate on this for us? :) #:Erik