From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet? Date: 2000/03/03 Message-ID: <3161063857499252@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 592598594 References: <3160523543335494@naggum.no> <38c0b4ec.72508742@news.earthlink.net> <3160693199764094@naggum.no> <38c34a5c.110764821@news.earthlink.net> <3160726754880201@naggum.no> <38c766c6.118038440@news.earthlink.net> <3160735878041395@naggum.no> <3160967673828621@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 952076602 10386 195.0.192.66 (3 Mar 2000 09:43:22 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2000 09:43:22 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Samuel A. Falvo II | What part of this didn't you understand? why you can't figure out that start-up time from storage media is utterly and completely irrelevant when you start 50 processes within the same second. incidentally, I consider your question an instance of losing your temper. control your own temper, you hypocrite, or shut up about that of others! | The only point I saw was that you can launch 2 copies of ACL 25 times a | second each. this is obviously an unwarranted conclusion on your part, since it took 1.5 second user+system time and 1 second real time, and only user+system matters. you have no data to support your conclusion, but you do have data to support that I could fire up 33 instances a second on one CPU from this data. so I just wish you could engage your brain before you engage your agenda. | Are you for real? Why are you getting so upset? Why can't you conduct | yourself like an adult? What did I do to deserve the personal attacks on | me by you? Where have I attacked you? And what did I attack you with? you're being obnoxious, stupid, impenetrably dense, and behave like an asshole with an irrelevant axe to grind. that's what I object to. and now you can't even control your own temper. how sickeningly _pathetic_. | All I did was point out that there were ambiguities in the measurements made | due to certain "basic" assumptions. I'm not interested in the theoretical | performance of ACL. I'm interested in the real-world, down-to-Earth, | in-the-trenches performance of ACL. and that's what you got, dude. now, will you _ever_ be satisfied? #:Erik