From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Macro question (bizarre) Date: 2000/03/19 Message-ID: <3162478065220549@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 599611696 References: <38D22BF9.DFFE6E3E@emi.u-bordeaux.fr> <8atcu9$f6m$1@nnrp1.deja.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 953489929 22740 195.0.192.66 (19 Mar 2000 18:18:49 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Mar 2000 18:18:49 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Tom Breton | OK, that basically touched the same points as Erik's, and my answer is | that I grant that values can do a little more than I said, on the | optimization front, but optimization should be a last resort. but what kind of code do you have before you "resort" to optimization? is this really a counter-argument to being _economical_? #:Erik