From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses Date: 2000/03/31 Message-ID: <3163496120774411@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 604780868 References: <38DBE821.F64C2B22@genworks.com> <3163031395198264@naggum.no> <8bneig$6s8$4@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <3163274599898094@naggum.no> <8bsgr1$ett$4@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <3163347243776063@naggum.no> <8bv663$jga$1@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 954508283 5870 195.0.192.66 (31 Mar 2000 13:11:23 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Mar 2000 13:11:23 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Anthony Cartmell" | um, excuse me, as far as I can tell Lisp code is made of many short, deeply | nested lists per file. that's, um, interesting. whence this shallow opinion that "Lisp code" is sufficiently homogeneous to warrant such a blanket generalization? | If I am wrong about Lisp source code's general form please enlighten me! there seems to be so much to enlighten you about that it is instead much more relevant at this point to use that fact to discredit your opinions. this is regrettable, but your lack of insight into the topics you spend so much time talking about renders any further discussion moot. #:Erik