From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: more questions about threads...
Date: 2000/04/05
Message-ID: <3163944808069043@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 607159018
References: <8buulu$jp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38ea854a$0$21260@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu> <38EB5786.5F4C8CBB@ncgr.org>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 954956085 22113 195.0.192.66 (5 Apr 2000 17:34:45 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 2000 17:34:45 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* David Hanley <djh@ncgr.org>
| And perhaps more critically: the ability to make use of more than one
| CPU if present.

  yet this may be what slows down the threads and speeds up the processes.

  I think a valuable benchmarking approach would be test the same kind of
  communication between the various kinds of processes, like sockets and
  some simple protocol.

#:Erik