From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Loop Syntax Date: 2000/04/13 Message-ID: <3164646276653331@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 610820649 References: <38EE1F8B.5FCE2BDF@asme.org> <8cqo0e$s7u$1@joe.rice.edu> <8cr52m$ivc$1@joe.rice.edu> <38F11D9F.8894A69F@san.rr.com> <8cr8nb$pje$1@joe.rice.edu> <38F13BF1.93E7D0FA@san.rr.com> <38F1F85B.251986FF@ncgr.org> <38F23527.CCBDEEB2@ncgr.org> <38F25803.7196BF8@ncgr.org> <38F3DAD8.1EC98817@san.rr.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 955657763 5843 195.0.192.66 (13 Apr 2000 20:29:23 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Apr 2000 20:29:23 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Tom Breton | Sorry, Erik is absolutely not someone you want to cite on optimization. I'm fascinated that you optimized your journey from ignorance to opinion by removing the normally required task of _reading_ what you opine on. this reflects on most of your other opinions on optimization, a least with me, because I optimize away the incredibly unrewarding task of trying to get past your personal hangups with people you don't agree with, which you might learn a little bit about if you read what I have written on _agreement_ as part of the process of argumentation, but it is by now fairly obvious that you also optimize away what other people call "learning experience". sigh. just get over it, Tom. I don't like being so important in some dreadful morons' lives as I am in yours and this "Courageous" fellow. #:Erik