From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: the evil of continuations Date: 2000/06/22 Message-ID: <3170671531374138@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 637642922 References: <3949E0DC.8E428904@eurocontrol.fr> <3dmdy739.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <4Pu25.84$4p1.1925@burlma1-snr2> <394A7C71.F1F75FE7@acm.org> <394A860B.360DFBE@acm.org> <871z1wqqzz.fsf@orion.dent.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de> <39520E40.471F87ED@rpal.rockwell.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961685081 8521 195.0.192.66 (22 Jun 2000 14:44:41 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jun 2000 14:44:41 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.lisp * Phil Stubblefield | Interesting. Do you mean: | | (1) you don't care about (a) for the purposes of this discussion; | | (2) you acknowledge the need for (a) but don't often have the time | and/or resources to utilitze it; | | (3) think (a) is a load of crap; or | | (4) some combination thereof? Or perhaps (5) think some other implementation technique is superior to using threads, so the performance of threads is irrelevant. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.