From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Lisp XML parser ?
Date: 2000/06/24
Message-ID: <3170830684565684@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 638397645
References: <39523341.CED20EE@bbn.com> <3170682110777797@naggum.no> <m2wvjh4b0o.fsf@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk> <3170708641147673@naggum.no> <m2n1kc4xzf.fsf@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk> <3170744203873830@naggum.no> <ey33dm45zhn.fsf@cley.com>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961844202 20132 195.0.192.66 (24 Jun 2000 10:56:42 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Jun 2000 10:56:42 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Tim Bradshaw <tfb@cley.com>
| Can entities also expand to syntactically/lexically-nonsensical
| things?

  Yes.  There are some feeble attempts to restrict the nonsense in
  SGML and some less feeble, but not particularly strong, attempts at
  same in XML.

#;Erik
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.