From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Lisp XML parser ? Date: 2000/06/25 Message-ID: <3170880537253039@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 638602962 References: <39523341.CED20EE@bbn.com> <3170682110777797@naggum.no> <3dm3kuya.fsf@supelec.fr> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961893313 8956 195.0.192.66 (25 Jun 2000 00:35:13 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 2000 00:35:13 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Fabrice Popineau | And what about DOM ??? Yes? What about DOM? Giving something an alternate representation and _nothing_ else does not constitute giving it meaning. Besides, I wrote what I think about DOM in <3170682110777797@naggum.no>: (And DOM is an incredibly ridiculous misunderstanding of "object oriented technology".) #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.