From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Newbie asking for help Date: 2000/06/27 Message-ID: <3171100118257473@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 639544056 References: <8iti9v$d19$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39527922.5BBF41CB@gmx.de> <3953971B.81E3A336@pacbell.net> <3170780959479982@naggum.no> <3953CD19.B8520C8@ISOMEDIA.COM> <3958397F.E7A5B9E3@pacbell.net> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962111641 16560 195.0.192.66 (27 Jun 2000 13:14:01 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jun 2000 13:14:01 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Steven M. Haflich" | Similarly, a reference to a variable may be either or both of "undeclared" | and "free". Rather than muck around in the meaning of these terms, I'd | ask Erik the following focussed question: I answered it years ago, to your satisfaction if I recall correctly. However, both the question and the answer have exactly _nothing_ to do with anything anybody else are or have been discussing. You brought up "undeclared" in attempt to quibble my "free variable" to death, and now you bring up "top-level" because it obviously didn't work to quibble over "undeclared" in the context we were discussing this. I have better things to do. You should go soak your head. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.