From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: [noise] manglish [was: lisp editors] Date: 2000/06/29 Message-ID: <3171296539165947@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 640522822 References: <8j0511$90c$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3170921244543105@naggum.no> <3171079683029591@naggum.no> <3958e71f_3@goliath.newsfeeds.com> <8javug$qtp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39590910_4@goliath.newsfeeds.com> <395b578b.273107648@news> <395b6661_4@goliath.newsfeeds.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962307904 14825 195.0.192.66 (29 Jun 2000 19:45:04 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jun 2000 19:45:04 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * thi | ah, english is not the universal unifier, after all... Oh, but it is. However, while you can lead a horse to water, you can't make it think. Similarly with dictionaries on the Net. You'd think it'd cost less to use one than to ask a newsgroup, but noooo. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.