From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Subject: Re: Injecting some sense into the C++ vs. Lisp debate
Date: 2000/07/21
Message-ID: <3173171887664481@naggum.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 649449143
References: <8knn4v$q21$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3173018312570485@naggum.net> <8l5d2h$gkm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 964270970 4352 195.0.192.66 (22 Jul 2000 13:02:50 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://naggum.no; http://naggum.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jul 2000 13:02:50 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Googleplexation is NOT an option! <deja_pcm@my-deja.com>
| Everyone enjoys a good argument and the temptation to fuel the the
| flames of a usenet discussion is often irresistable, as you have so
| consistently demonostrated Erik :)

  Every master loves to see one his students surpass him, yet is
  unhappy about the direction the student takes when he no longer
  feels he needs the master.

#:Erik
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.