Subject: Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 2000/11/29
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "">
| You purposely inflict pain on people in order to make them get rid of
| their knee-jerk reactions (see Message-ID:
| <>). This is behaviourism, is it not?

  If you add about a million other bogus things, you might end up with
  behaviourism.  If you don't, you don't end up with behaviourism.

  I have not added the million other things.  You seem to think you have
  the right to ignore that they need to be added.  That's just idiotic.

| If we *dont* understand each other, just forget the previous paragraph
| and tell me how i misunderstood your post with Message-ID:
| <> instead.

  I should tell you how you misunderstood something you don't give any
  clue to how you understood!?  What's wrong with your thinking ability?

  Solution to U.S. Presidential Election Crisis 2000:
    Let Texas secede from the Union and elect George W. Bush their
    very first President.  All parties, states would rejoice.