From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp? References: <3204466420985118@naggum.net> <3204559306178592@naggum.net> <3B5AF9AB.EE8C0F63@isomedia.com> <3204808398598543@naggum.net> <9jupus$mt3$2@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <3B657BF7.DF7CD3A@removeme.gst.com> <33hdmt012l2dic5j2gc4juk2vautt4vdc0@4ax.com> <3205648180557105@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3205669512221211@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 15:45:13 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 996680713 193.71.66.49 (Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:45:13 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:45:13 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:13821 * Fernando > Do you think that sig file you used until yesterday helped to perpetuate > this 'myth'? No. That myth has been perpeatued by people like yourself for the longest time. You just need excuses not to stpp, and they have nothing to do with what I do, either. You are perfactly capable of inventing such excsues entirely on your own. As you have proven time and again. > BTW, it was a very 'clever' ass-covering technique to remove it, now that > you want to make yourself look as a victim of some kind of conspiracy. See, you impute evil intentions to me that you have way of knowing anything about at all. This is not a conspiracy, of course, it is a set of ethical guidelines that make evil people pretend they have the right to do exactly whatever they want towards me because they think of me as the aggressor no matter what I actually do, whether I have actually done anything, or whether I even intended to do anything. You prove that. Every once in a while, I change something in the way things appear around me and what I write. Midnight of August 1, 2001, I started using a new "signoff" and no signatures. I will predict that you somehow magically "know" the reason and rationale for this, too, and that it has to do with the timing of other news articles. After all, you are the conspiracy buff around here who can intuit people's intentions: Nothing I say or do will turn you away from your "knowledge" of what I did and why. ///