From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!134.222.94.5!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community References: <3208226254834485@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3208244153024600@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:55:53 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 999255353 193.90.207.57 (Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:55:53 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:55:53 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:15201 * richard_k@gmx.net (Richard Krush) > In your article you made an impression that LISP is a religion or at > least a philosophy and that unbelievers (so-called "destructive/rabid > nutcases" or "negative morons") are sent by the satan. Huh!? If you get that impression, if it is because you think in those terms. I most certainly do not. Enthusiasm and religion do have some emotions in common, but I think you must be out of your mind if you see evidence of your impression in what I wrote. > Moreover, people who choose to be blind when it comes to the bad sides > and to the fact that standards change and new needs arrive, _can_ be > called "religious zealots". Nobody chooses to be blind to them (where do you get these insane ideas?), they simply do not denigrate the whole language because of things they do not use or, better, work to improve through the standardization channels they trust to correct mistakes because they still love the language. Obviously, you did not get the message at all. Let me just hope somebody else does. ///