From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!134.222.94.5!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community References: <3208226254834485@naggum.net> <3208266416884194@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3208273247172189@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:00:48 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 999284448 193.71.66.49 (Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:00:48 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:00:48 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:15259 * Sam Steingold > so when you have "work at hand", you use CLISP (or ACL, or whatever tool > you want) and act as a professional, and when writing to c.l.l, you > badmouth the people who brought it to you. Are you incapable of understanding that _you_ have done something that you could very easily correct to avoid all criticism? Is that you want to _insist_ on badmouthing the standard that you fail to understand that you _deserve_ this criticism? > BTW, why don't you direct at least some of your venom to GCL? Because they do not gratuitously defame that which they purport to conform to. > It does not even purport to comply! Bingo! Please get the idea. > As to the passages on the CLISP pages which disturb you so much - well, > CLISP is a large project, and I am not done with it yet. :-) Please send > patches, to the pages and to the CLISP sources. You know what fix. ///