From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!134.222.94.5!npeer.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community References: <3208226254834485@naggum.net> <867kvke4iz.fsf@gondolin.local.net> <3208254606019619@naggum.net> <1f4c5c5c.0108311044.2399e124@posting.google.com> <1f4c5c5c.0108312034.1b1e140a@posting.google.com> <1f4c5c5c.0109011022.72a56a2b@posting.google.com> <1f4c5c5c.0109012324.43d24c7@posting.google.com> <3208404998010473@naggum.net> <87itf1a2fh.fsf_-_@piracy.red-bean.com> <99fb3972.0109021504.bba92d0@posting.google.com> <3208475381413624@naggum.net> <3208495354884218@naggum.net> <3208515900839780@naggum.net> <3208551490117677@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3208558987898100@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 02:23:09 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 999570189 193.71.66.49 (Tue, 04 Sep 2001 04:23:09 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 04:23:09 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:15529 * John Foderaro > Now do you understand? Make no statements about me unless you can > substantiate them. Otherwise the good people who read this newsgroup > will think that you are wasting their precious time persuing your own > personal vendetta. So this is what you finally sink to. I am frankly quite disappointed. You started this personal vendetta, John Foderaro. Doing that with me is pretty darn stupid. Now that you recognize that you are losing, you are turning into an Erann Gat. Your new line of _threatening_ is also pretty amazing. Who do you think you are? The IRS? And how much money do you think you have caused Franz Inc. to lose because of your behavior by now? If you had been able to back down and listen to people, this could have been an interesting technical discussion that could have resulted in some of your retarded views not looking quite so retarded. _Arguing_ for your views seems to be one of your least developed skills, however. Now that you recognize this, all you can do is bicker over references. I am frankly amazed that you think you can win anything that way, but hey, that is precisely why I have beat you into the ground and not vice versa. Just shut up, John Foderaro. There is no other way to control the damage you do to yourself and to your employer. Where are your requirements of substantiation when you speak about me? As long a you keep posting obvious misrepresentations of what I say, your demands are so hypocritical as to be _moronic_. Why you want to appear that way to people is, however, beyond me. But now that you have done more damage to yourself than I ever could do to you, perhaps it is time to let you crawl back to your miserable cave and lick your wounds. ///