From ...
Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!134.222.94.5!npeer.kpnqwest.net!reader3.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Style question Was: Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
References: <3208226254834485@naggum.net> <MPG.1601adf1bf0a248989714@news.dnai.com> <9n9624$k2q$1@rznews2.rrze.uni-erlangen.de> <lk3d5yhgaq.fsf_-_@pc022.bln.elmeg.de> <3208894995746184@naggum.net> <9nc2di$kkj$1@rznews2.rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Message-ID: <3208926700032429@naggum.net>
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 08:31:41 GMT
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net
X-Trace: reader3.kpnqwest.net 999937901 193.71.66.49 (Sat, 08 Sep 2001 10:31:41 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 10:31:41 MET DST
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:15935

* Jochen Schmidt <jsc@dataheaven.de>
> Does that mean that ACL would be able to inline local function-calls like 
> used in my first example?

  No.  "Should have worked" is different from "should work".  The former
  means it does not.

> The ability to inline at least local function-calls is rather important
> for  me, since I often use FLET or LABELS to abstract complicated
> control-flow situations.

  How Scheme.  :)

///