Subject: Re: Time for a Fresh Scheme Standard: Say Goodbye to the RnRS Relic
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:48:02 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Erik Naggum
> Could you explain what "oxymoronically-named "Common" Lisp?" is if not an
> attack? [...]

* MJ Ray
| It's just a statement -- If Common Lisp were common, would we be having this
| discussion?

  Your annoying beliggerence is just stupid, now.  Cut it out.

> And just _why_ do you attack me?  You are just warm and welcoming, right?

| I didn't challenge you (cf OPN).

  Who do you think you are kidding?  Some fellow Scheme retards?

| Oh, I wonder what you're smoking.

  Your annoying beliggernce is growing more and more stupid.  Cut it out.

| Just because we flame one gutless troll doesn't mean that all diversity
| is lambasted.  After all, without diversity, is there progress?

  Well, this _would_ explain the lack of progress in the Scheme family.

| Sorry, I lack the enthusiasm to devote time to attempts at decrypting the
| side-effects of your latest medication dose increase.

  Your obviously superior experience with medication doses aside, please do
  not project your personality problems onto others.  Just because you have
  never learned to cope with those who disagree with you and need medical
  attention whenever you meet someone who does, does not mean that anybody
  else suffers from your kind of mental illness, despite the preponderance
  of victims in the Scheme community that makes it appear normal to you
  guys, including the sense of appropriateness of your more than usually
  stupid personal attack.  What is _wrong_ with you Scheme freaks?

| Ad hom. attacks and repetition don't make the basis for an interesting
| response.

  No, they certainly do not.  Please return to your cave, now.  Thank you.

  Scheme is _clearly_ the language only of deficient minds.