From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.190.198.17!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news2.kpn.net!news.kpn.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader3.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: package locking References: <3C3E7F57.7F80395@pacbell.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3219750011279325@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:00:12 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader3.kpnqwest.net 1010761212 193.71.66.49 (Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:00:12 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:00:12 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:24030 * "Steven M. Haflich" | You see, the package locking system could never be smart enough to | determine which implementor is the guru and which is the fool... I thought that was what the without-package-locks macro was for. /// --