From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!freenix!deine.net!hamster.europeonline.net!newsfeed.europeonline.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp? References: Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3224967825356262@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:23:34 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 1015979014 193.71.199.50 (Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:23:34 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:23:34 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:28692 * Erann Gat | The introduction to R5RS says, "Scheme was the first major dialect of | Lisp to [have certain distinguishing features]". So it does call itself | a "dialect of Lisp." When was this written? | Injured? No. Whatever gave you that impression? If not you, some people sure act terribly injured if you say "Scheme is not a Lisp" to them or tell them to stop saying "Scheme is a Lisp". /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.