From ...
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!newsfeed.esat.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: What should S-expression based languages be called?  (was: Re: Why  is Scheme not a Lisp?)
References: <gat-1203021200230001@eglaptop.jpl.nasa.gov> <3c91101b.50489765@nntp.interaccess.com> <sfwu1rkdcbo.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <gat-1303021036490001@eglaptop.jpl.nasa.gov> <3225042418121611@naggum.net> <gat-1303021435250001@eglaptop.jpl.nasa.gov> <sfwzo1c2cuz.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <87k7sfc38l.fsf@charter.net> <u1yen4wna.fsf@theworld.com> <3C913E3A.A368F0ED@kolumbus.fi>
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Message-ID: <3225147207934879@naggum.net>
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:13:16 GMT
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no
X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 1016158396 193.71.199.50 (Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:13:16 MET)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:13:16 MET
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:28985

* Martti Halminen
| Another S-exp -style language would be one of the internal
| representations in the gcc compiler.

  The good old WAIS sources appeared to be using Common Lisp syntax using a
  format like (:source {<keyword> <value>}*).

///
-- 
  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.