From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!ossa.telenet-ops.be!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Questions about Symbolics lisp machines References: <3C9A12FC.8EC6D8CA@smi.de> <86pu1sfac8.fsf@kirk.localdomain> <87bsdctb3p.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226103902356257@naggum.net> <878z8gufhz.fsf@becket.becket.net> <873cyncgz7.fsf@becket.becket.net> <87hen3jg8c.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226213471881050@naggum.net> <87g02lsupg.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226280843254377@naggum.net> <87bsd9xm4l.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226290124809690@naggum.net> <87n0wswqif.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226327500923265@naggum.net> <87r8m4v879.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226334265378318@naggum.net> <874rj0v4fp.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3226336747374046@naggum.net> <87n0wstmis.fsf@becket.becket.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3226342032898547@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 22:06:58 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1017353218 193.71.199.50 (Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:06:58 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:06:58 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:30464 * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | Um, geez, you totally misunderstood me, but then, that's normal for | you. I am not your projections. Quit being such a dishonest bastard that you confuse your conclusions and your observation and try to make others share your conclusions. They can reach their own conclusions, but somehow I think you do not trust them to reach the same conclusions you do, so they need your "help". | In any case, if you have an actual accusation to make, then make it. You are an evil person, destructive, disrespectful, toying with people because you probably have no way to prove me wrong when I point out that you are an intellectualy dishonest and very destructive person. | Really? Hrm, of course you told me that you thought it was never harmful | to offer someone a choice. I never said any such thing. You "misunderstand" on purpose in order to make me look foolish when my own words and what I actually say could not accomplish that, and you know it, or you would simply have been able to refute my arguments. But then again, what I want from my fellow men is a symptom of _thinking_ about issues, but you do not exhibit any symptoms of that. | But then you don't have opinions, you just have reactions. That must be why you keep posting insults and lies about me. You just made yourself so much worse, but then again, you cannot even discuss things civilly in personal mail, so this is pure evil on your part. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.