Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:40:03 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Thomas Bushnell, BSG
| You protest that ozan s yigit has accompanied his request with "abusive
| behavior".  And yet you actually *do* exhibit abusive (and cowardly)
| behavior every chance you get.

  Please quit projecting yourself onto me.

| Rings a little hollow to hear you complain about someone else's allegedly
| abusive behavior.

  Of course _you_ think it does.  You, like ozan s yigit, have been
  incredibly abusive and blame me for your behavior.  You simply cannot
  understand your own role and can _not_ quit your abuse behavior, but
  quite unlike me, you step into all sorts of discussions with _purely_
  off-topic crap about other people.  CAN YOU QUIT THAT MORONIC SHIT?

| Oh, if you want to disprove the "cowardly" label, just put your
| accusations in writing and send them to my department.

  Thomas Bushnell, you are the coward here.  You have declined to answer my
  request for the the name and address of those you want me to inform of
  their role as the evidence of your ability to think.  Fess up or shut up!

| That would be the courage of your convictions in action.

  Your department (why did it change from your advisor?) really has nothing
  to do with your retarded and abusive behavior, but _you_ involve them in
  it, and that is the only thing I intend to inform them of.  However, I
  would like to do this as officially as possible, so I need the name of
  the people who have guaranteed that you can think.  If you just keep
  repeating this moronic line and continue to decline to provide the names
  and addresses of the people you want to involve, the label "coward" will
  stick to you for a very long time.

  What you keep doing here is so ridiculous that it is itself reason to
  inform the people _you_ want to implicate, but _you_ have to inform us
  all of who those people are.  However, I consider your failure to grasp
  that your posting here on a newsgroup does not constitute violation of
  any rules, but your implication of your university, department, graduate
  program, or individual people, _does_.  I want you to name those people
  if you are so concerned about not being labeled a coward.  You are simply
  an abusive idiot for playing this stupid trick, but I would prefer if you
  were not such a chickenshit that you keep this going by inviting what you
  do not have the guts to complete.  _Name_ the people and provide their
  address to this forum, or shut the fuck up.

  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.