From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.esat.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc1.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: lisp as a mutiple team programming language? References: <87elhczz8r.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3CC1C617.51D5160D@nyc.rr.com> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3228325348518404@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:02:31 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1019336551 193.71.199.50 (Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:02:31 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:02:31 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:32112 * Kenny Tilton | The downside is that average folk get crippled resumes because no one | else wants their skills. If they can learn one domain-specific language in a reasonable amount of time and become proficient in it, why would they be unable to repeat such an endeavor? If they could not learn it, they would move on to something else before it became a millstone around their neck, right? So I do not understand this argument. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief. Post with compassion: http://home.chello.no/~xyzzy/kitten.jpg