Subject: Re: lisp as a mutiple team programming language?
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:29:27 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3228427766731355@naggum.net>

* Kenny Tilton
| The downside is that average folk get crippled resumes because no one
| else wants their skills.

* Erik Naggum
> If they can learn one domain-specific language in a reasonable amount of
> time and become proficient in it, why would they be unable to repeat such
> an endeavor?

* Kenny Tilton <ktilton@nyc.rr.com>
| I said the resumes were crippled, not them.
| 
| woof!

  You are barking up the wrong tree.  Please realize that I was arguing
  against the notion that the resumes would be "crippled" -- if they had
  acquired a skill in a short amount of time, that should be valuable, etc.

///
-- 
  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.

  Post with compassion: http://home.chello.no/~xyzzy/kitten.jpg