From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news.netway.at!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nnum.kpnqwest.net!EU.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Lisp syntax References: Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3231410891291378@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 14:08:13 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1022422093 193.71.199.50 (Sun, 26 May 2002 16:08:13 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 16:08:13 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:33933 * Adam Warner | That's a poor example of more complex syntax Oleg. Lisp s-notation is | just as simple as Scheme. Both Lisp and Scheme have extremely simple | syntax. Not so. Scheme has no programmable reader. Common Lisp does. Please do not feed the trolls, and more so not with bogus answers. -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief. 70 percent of American adults do not understand the scientific process.