From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.70.164.134!news.ost.eltele.no!newsfeed1.ulv.nextra.no!nextra.com!news01.chello.no!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: PART TWO: winning industrial-use of lisp: Re: Norvig's latest paper on Lisp References: <87adpp6bpt.fsf@blitz.comp.com> <874rfx7o8g.fsf@pokey.henrik-motakef.de> <3233597365319650@naggum.net> <3233657972711587@naggum.net> <87it4chb7c.fsf@blitz.comp.com> <877kksjvjo.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3233679973026336@naggum.net> <87lm98ic93.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3233682788738209@naggum.net> <87vg8cglbp.fsf@becket.becket.net> <3233698010286151@naggum.net> <3233702569190102@naggum.net> <87sn3f695m.fsf@becket.becket.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3233747784144981@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:16:24 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.no X-Trace: news01.chello.no 1024758984 212.186.234.171 (Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:16:24 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:16:24 MET DST X-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:16:24 MET DST (news01.chello.no) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:35508 * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | Do you have evidence? Other people who agree with you? People who | actually know me? You have said do so yourself, here in this newsgroup. Of course, you forget what you say, and so do I, most of it, but some things stick. You really do _enjoy_ hurting people and you do it for no reason whatsoever. You are the aggressor, Thomas Bushnell. Back down. Quit it. Stop playing games. | Are you willing to put that into print somewhere where the libel or slander | laws clearly apply? Or are you just a tedious coward? You have not slandered me anywhere libel and slander laws clearly apply, so why do I need to _answer_ your behavior anywhere but where you misbehave? Perhaps you are just very, very unintelligent and really think that I have attacked you first. This is not so. You attack me, and I answer you where you have attacked me. Since you are such a fucking coward that you only use this forum for it, I have no _reason_ to go after you elsewhere. WHy is this so hard for your sub-Bush IQ to come to grips with? You keep bringing this act of bravery up, but I do not see you going out of your way to seek media where your acts could cause you trouble. Why not? And why is it so bad to be a coward? I would _love_ to steal the tapes from your psychiatric sessions to find out what went on in your childhood that makes you think that you can ask something to do something stupid that you refuse to do yourself, and then call others cowards in the hopes that that will make you look anything but like a retarded, angry child. You are such a pathetic specimen, Thomas Bushnell, and your need to deflect criticism is such a charming personaltiy trait -- in a child.. A little child emotionally still at the level of a six-year-old, I would guess. How cute. Except that you are probably 18 or something equally mature and testosteroneladen. -- Guide to non-spammers: If you want to send me a business proposal, please be specific and do not put "business proposal" in the Subject header. If it is urgent, do not use the word "urgent". If you need an immediate answer, give me a reason, do not shout "for your immediate attention". Thank you.