From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!newsfeed.esat.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nnum.kpnqwest.net!EU.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: PART TWO: winning industrial-use of lisp: Re: Norvig's latest paper on Lisp References: <86d6unh1p1.fsf@rowlf.interhack.net> <3233615371462919@naggum.net> <3233677487195639@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3233831343471646@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:29:03 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 1024842543 193.71.199.50 (Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:29:03 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:29:03 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:35578 * Tim Bradshaw | No. That is the precise usage I'd generate. Or `We're going to meet | the new employee tomorrow, they'll be here at 9:30'. How about "..., which should be here at 9:30"? -- Guide to non-spammers: If you want to send me a business proposal, please be specific and do not put "business proposal" in the Subject header. If it is urgent, do not use the word "urgent". If you need an immediate answer, give me a reason, do not shout "for your immediate attention". Thank you.