From ...
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!Norway.EU.net!not-for-mail
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: *Why* is LISP better?
Date: 03 Aug 2002 19:49:32 +0000
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3237392972925404@naggum.no>
References: <JYK19.12172$pg2.978693@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <ttM19.126484$Wi.32643419@twister.nyc.rr.com> <87ado4hso0.fsf@meo-dipt.andreas.org> <3237378529317749@naggum.no> <87wur7hq6p.fsf@meo-dipt.andreas.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 1028404173 8518 193.71.199.50 (3 Aug 2002 19:49:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@KPNQwest.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 2002 19:49:33 GMT
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:37207

* Andreas Bogk
| If the code is not data, then how do you feed it into the compiler/
| interpreter?

  You mean all code is made up of bits, and all data is made up of bits, so
  therefore code is data?  I regret that I took your bait.  Bummer.

-- 
Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway

Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder.
Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.