From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Simple newbie list processing troubble Date: 28 Sep 2002 14:05:58 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 17 Message-ID: <3242210758749239@naggum.no> References: <10b28c6c.0209280104.52056c24@posting.google.com> <3D959BFC.D1305E7D@dls.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1033221958 6528 129.240.65.5 (28 Sep 2002 14:05:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Sep 2002 14:05:58 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:42299 * Paul F. Dietz | Btw, use of the name 'lst' marks you as a Schemer. :) * Bruce Hoult | Paul Graham uses "lst" throughout _On Lisp_, from the tutorial section to | the mini-CLOS implementation at the end. I read this as affirming Paul's point. But why bother affirming it, so I think perhaps you meant to contradict it. Would you care to explain why you think «On Lisp» is not an effort to bring some of Scheme into Common Lisp? (Please note that he has said so himself.) -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.