From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: some stuff about the 2002 International Lisp Conference in SF Date: 10 Nov 2002 18:31:18 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3245941878413642@naggum.no> References: <_hMy9.1126$Aq5.112540@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <3dccf508$0$146$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> <7h3el9uyk0f.fsf@pc150.maths.bris.ac.uk> <7h3u1ip326r.fsf@pc150.maths.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1036953078 888 129.240.65.201 (10 Nov 2002 18:31:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 2002 18:31:18 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:46196 * Michael Hudson | Are there situations in CL where an anonymous function has clear benefits | over a flet? (defun silly-example () (flet ((flet () 'hello)) #'flet)) Most people would prefer an anonymous function here. -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.